Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Ed Raise

Is it me or when Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach said he's giving himself and cabinet a 30% raise that it's because they want to attract brighter and better people to public service--isn't he kind of saying that all the existing MLAs and all the candidates that ran weren't quite good enough?

Hey, don't get me wrong, I do think our elected officials should get paid more, but I would rather start with Edmonton city council. Those folks truly don't get paid well enough to attract brighter and better candidates (although some definitely are), but keep in mind they did just give themselves a big raise last year.

But that's the key, ... in both situations, our provincial and civic elected officials gave THEMSELVES the raise.

While I don't think many of them deserve it, the amount spent doesn't even compare to the other cost savings in many city departments that council brushes over.

And on another note, doesn't everyone wish city council approved the Calgary Trail and 23rd Avenue interchange as well as the southern LRT expansion, like a decade ago, and perhaps at different times? Now that both Calgary Trail AND 111 Street are filled with mass construction, getting to the airport is daunting in the day time.

As well, if city council went into some debt at the time to pay for these projects, the amount of interest paid would not have been as much as skyrocketing construction costs that have accumulated since.

Poor planning. Which is why with the amount of growth Edmonton is experiencing, the infrastructure spending can't keep up, so property taxes are raised by a lot each year, which simply hurts fixed income folks like seniors.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Saskatchewan to elect senators

Yay! The Saskatchewan government is looking to hold elections for vacant senate seats. But note the typical comment from a Liberal senator:

However, there are many who believe Senate elections are a bad idea. Liberal Senator Pana Merchant says elections will politicize an institution that's supposed to be above that.

"The Senate now is a house of conversation, of serious second look at legislation that comes to us unencumbered by political restraints," she said. "Not quite as political, I would say, as the House of Commons."

"Not quite as political"? "Unencumbered"? You were appointed by Chretien in 2002! How's that not political? Insenaty now!

Friday, May 16, 2008

Stephane Dion -- To Carbon Tax or Not to Carbon Tax

Alberta Arvark points out a column by Edmonton Journal columnist, Lorne Gunter, on Liberal "leader" Stephane Dion being adamant about saying he wouldn't introduce a carbon tax if Prime Minister.

Well, I guess he was just blowing carbon up your ass.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Minimum Drink Prices

So the Stelmach Alberta government's solution to the two cops who were attacked over the weekend outside an Edmonton bar is to:

A) Hire more cops

B) Have better police training

C) Penalize the bar for poor security

D) Raise drink prices and limit happy hour for everyone

Well, if you said D, you are correct. Unfortunately.

This is a stupid, stupid idea. I've commented on this and raising the drinking age before. The government has no business in price regulation ... I know, I know.

But what happened to the $650,000 spent on the "Cage Your Rage" campaign. Remember that from back in June 2007? Ooh, wow, looks like it worked wonders!!!

Doesn't this government have better things to do?

I'll say it again ... I believe bars (any business for that matter) should be able to stay open whenever they want and set prices to whatever they want. Having more security and police in place, curbs anyone thinking of crossing the line. Think Vegas folks. Anyone unruly in Vegas, security is on you faster than you can imagine.

When police are unable to do their jobs, it's not the businesses' fault if operating legally. Instead of spending money on stupid laws and useless "awareness" campaigns, why not hire and train more police?

I've obviously got no problem with police enforcing the law. No one should. That's what they're there for! As a population grows, like in Edmonton, you're going to need more and more police.

So with higher and higher drink prices, does anyone really think anyone is going to drink less and prevent the odd idiot nimrod not be violent on the rare occasion? I don't think so.

I can't believe I'm even commenting on this. Premier Ed, sorry to say, but this is a really, really stupid idea and won't do a thing but hurt businesses trying to bring people into their establishments, make a buck and employ people.

Friday, May 09, 2008

107 year old veteran a Canadian again

Well, this is most certainly a noble announcement...
PRIME MINISTER HARPER ANNOUNCES CITIZENSHIP FOR CANADA’S LAST KNOWN SURVIVING VETERAN OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR

May 9, 2008
Ottawa, Ontario

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today announced that John Babcock, Canada’s last known surviving veteran of the First World War, is to be granted Canadian citizenship in recognition of his military service to Canada and his expressed desire, at age 107, to become a citizen of the country where he was born.

“We are proud to welcome Mr. Babcock back into the Canadian family and to honour the service he gave our country,” said Prime Minister Harper. “He symbolizes a generation of Canadians who, in many ways, were the authors of modern Canadian nationhood. When Canada went to war in 1914 we were widely perceived as a mere colony of Britain. By the end of the war, the world recognized Canada as a proud and independent country. Mr. Babcock and his fellow servicemen helped make possible Canada’s coming of age and I thank them from the bottom of my heart.”

John Babcock was born on July 23, 1900 on a farm near Kingston, Ontario. As a teenager, he joined a Canadian Army youth battalion and was sent overseas as part of the Canadian Expeditionary Force.

In the 1920s, Mr. Babcock moved to the United States. He became a U.S. citizen in 1946, and automatically lost his status as a British subject. The Canadian Citizenship Act, which legally established Canadian citizenship for the first time, only came into force in 1947.

Meetings with Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson prompted the decision to grant Canadian citizenship to Mr. Babcock. “He told me he considers himself a Canadian at heart,” said Minister Thompson. Last month he presented Mr. Babcock with a Minister of Veterans Affairs Commendation in recognition of his contributions to the care and well-being of Veterans and to the remembrance of their sacrifices and achievements.

On hearing of Mr. Babcock and his wish to obtain Canadian citizenship, the Prime Minister urged his minister to act as quickly as possible. ”Mr. Babcock will become a Canadian citizen as soon as he takes the oath of citizenship,” Prime Minister Harper said. “This means the last known soldier to serve Canada in the First World War will forever be a Canadian.”

More information on Mr. Babcock and the Minister of Veterans Affairs Commendation can be found on the Veterans Affairs Canada Web site www.vac-acc.gc.ca. A copy of Mr. Babcock’s letter to the Prime Minister is also available on the Prime Minister’s website at www.pm.gc.ca.

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Minister Bernier and the biker chick

The Liberal and Bloc opposition are really reaching when they dig up the past life of a minister's ex-girlfriend. Pretty sad, actually.

Another sad thing is when Bloc leader, Gilles Duceppe, lambasts our Governor General for talking about francophones abroad in Canada to French President Sarkozy.

In other news, a friend of mine told me she's in love with Nova Scotia Conservative MP, Peter Mackay and the next time I see him, to mention that. Thing is, she's no conservative by any means. Mind you, neither was Belinda.

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

"It's Obama"

Former Clinton advisor, Dick Morris, talks about the Indiana and North Carolina primaries today, plus the result of the Clinton camp "secretly" trying to shore up the missing Florida and Michigan votes.

In summary, as I had said weeks ago, even before Pennsylvania, that Obama can't lose.

Morris goes into great detail on the Democratic Party process on what Hillary would have to do to win, and it's ugly.

Canada?

Anything significant happening in Canada on the political scene? Is the "In and Out Scandal" in and out of the public's head? I think so. Is Stephane Dion too chicken to force and election? Yep. The Liberals are broke and aren't raising any money. Will Liberal Deputy Leader Michael Ignatieff and newly elected MP Bob Rae continue to sneak behind the scenes and ensure they're ready when Dion loses the next election... badly? You bet your bollocks.

I've said it many times. The next federal election will be in October 2009, which is when, by law, the Conservative gov't set the date to start fixed election dates from here on in.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Democratic Race post Penn.

With 99% of the precincts reporting in the Pennsylvania democratic primary, 55% for Hillary and 45% for Obama, with 158 regular pledged delegates up for grabs, and after all the wait and hoopla, Hillary really only put a 16 delegate dent into Obama's lead. Big frickin' deal.

RECAP...

[Before Penn. Regular] + [Before Penn. Super] + [Regular Penn. Delegates] = [Current Total]

Hillary:
1254 + 254 + 87 = 1595

Obama:
1416 + 230 + 71 = 1717 (+122)

The question over the next couple weeks before the May 6th Indiana and North Carolina primaries is do the superdelegates believe that Obama can beat McCain?

I would say so. Not only did Obama cut into Hillary's 20-30 point lead in Pennsylvania, but he has been able to cut into Hillary's superdelegate lead big time by gaining over 85% of them in the past couple months.

Superdelegates are being cautious.

After the May 6th primaries, I predict this race is over because the remaining 312 superdelegates will migrate to Obama when he wins North Carolina and stays within 5 points in Indiana leaving little chance for Hillary to win.

I think the Democratic party won't include the missed Florida and Michigan primaries unless the race is very, very tight, but by that time, will the candidates have any money left?

Friday, April 04, 2008

MLK


"...thank God Almighty..."

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

United North America? Why?

I remember watching a TV mini-series on Benedict Arnold when he led the attacks during the Invasion of Canada and Battle of Quebec. He was shot in the leg and he supposedly kept the bullet throughout his life. The program depicted to me that because of this one bullet, Canada didn't fall into the hands of the Americans.

Today, I stumbled upon a website of a non-profit group dedicated to the unification of Canada and the U.S.

http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/

Then there's also this blog. Or just search this for other N.A. Unionist websites. And this idea.

If you asked me several years ago when the Liberals were running this country, I was seriously considering the benefits of a North American Union. But we now have a Stephen Harper-led Conservative government that's doing a pretty good job of securing our sovereignty, especially in the North, and from the Americans, who believe the Northwest Passage is international waters--which is most certainly is not.

But let me further explain to you my reasoning as to why there should NOT be a North American Union and why this would not benefit Canada. I believe the U.S. would benefit much more from this. All that said, in knowing history, no empire lasts forever and I do believe in the distant future that a North American Union is inevitable in order to compete with Europe, India, and especially China. But perhaps we can stave it off for as long as possible.

As some of you know, I travel in the U.S. for work quite often and have been to Seattle, Vegas, California, Kansas, Chicago, Ohio, and Virginia/DC. I've met lots of Americans and many are dear, dear friends of mine--truly wonderful people. That said, many other Americans I've met are unknowingly ignorant of Canada. I could go on about all the cute things they say about Canadians, but let's move on...

Here's WHY Canada should NOT join the US to form a Union.

  • Compared to the U.S., Canada's natural and oil resources are so vast, they will sustain our energy needs for a long time. I actually tell Americans that they invaded the wrong country.

  • Would Canadians then be mired in the Iraq war? Who's next, Iran?

  • On defense, Canada and the U.S. mutually already use the Distant Early Warning (DEW) system and NORAD to monitor missile attacks. That said, it is a little known fact that Canadian troops are some of the best trained in the world, especially in regards to fighter pilots and snipers.

  • The current U.S. economy, with the sub-prime mortgage fiasco, trade-deficit, massive government deficit and debt (mostly owed to Chinese banks), and weak dollar aren't exactly as appealling as the healthy provincial economies, rising house prices, oil revenues, trade-surplus, lowered debt to GDP ratio, and strengthening dollar. Yes it's true that Canada relies heavily upon trade with the U.S.

  • I'd also guess that due to the weather, many Canadians would flock to the warmer climates during winter, badly hurting tourism and local economies in Canada.

  • The Canadian education system and gov't funding for it is superior to that of the U.S.

  • Federal income taxes are actually LOWER in Canada than in the U.S. The difference is with each individual state compared to provincial taxes.

  • On arts and culture, I believe there are vast differences. I'm a firm believer that Canadian comedians, musicians, and actors, per capita, are much, much, much funnier, more talented, and more creative than Americans. Canadian arts and culture has continued to blend the best aspects of British and American ideas into a new and fresh style that I find most appealling.

  • Would a new union then make each province a state? There are vast differences between the federal-provincial and federal-state relationships that would be difficult to negotiate. Would Prince Edward Island, with a population the size of Topeka, Kansas really get two senators, or would some provinces have to get together with others?

  • Internationally, Canada is distinct from the U.S. Always has been. Canadian soldiers in WWI and WWII really put Canada on the map in terms of respect with the liberation of our European allies.

  • Wouldn't a union be then seen as a greater threat to China? What economic power that China already has over the U.S. then influence the entire N.A. Union?

  • Would Canadians accept the U.S. constitution and their stance on gun rights, the Bill of Rights compared with

  • What about the legal system? Would U.S. precedent dominate over our British/Canadian common law system?

  • Would Quebec continue to be as independent on several issues within such a union? Then why couldn't new Canadian states?

  • Beer, beef, and hockey. I just had to say it. There's nothing better.
Overall, it seems that those touting a North American Union would see the U.S. totally dominate over Canadian history and tradition, essentially erasing whatever Canadians have fought for for their OWN country. The Russians tried to do this with Ukraine (and continue to do so). The English tried to do this with Scotland (although they have a union of their own now). There are numerous examples. But while the British under Wolfe did defeat the French under Montcalm at the battle on the Plains of Abraham in 1759, French culture is still preserved in Quebec and other parts of Canada to this day.

Most of all, mutual competition is a good thing as it's human nature to compete and make things better than the next guy. It's how we evolve. Monopolies aren't good, whether it's corporate or governmental, or we all just become thoughtless drones dictated by unaccountable bureaucrats, agencies, and executives, and democracy fades.

So let's say, for example, that a Union was negotiated between our leaders, or let's say that it's been happening for years already, but coming to head. I really don't think Americans would mind it at all, but how much would Canadians oppose such a deal? Would there be protests? Definitely. Would Canadians rise up militarily?

Let me ask you fellow Canadians... Is Canada still worth fighting for?

What if the U.S., a la Canadian Bacon invaded Canada? With 90% of the Canadian population living within 100 miles of the border, would we be able to pull their jerseys over the Americans' heads and give 'em a hockey wollop, stave off attacks in snow bunkers for days on end, while our world renowned fighter pilots and snipers pick the invaders off one by one?

Or will one bullet in the leg of an American general do?